SOB’s Grins & Grumps

Everything Between Heaven and Earth and Beyond

  • Copyrights and Contact

    Henric C. Jensen
    All images and Artwork are
    © 2006-2018 Henric C. Jensen

  • July 2018
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr    
  • Categories

  • Meta

  • Advertisements
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

A look at B. Freedman’s Speech 1

The introduction to this speech:

“He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.”

This isn’t a statement by Freedman himself – but it does spread some light on the source and motivation for the speech – “Judeo-Communist victory 1945”. Who, according to the originator of this introduction, was responsible for the victory in WWII? The Jews (Judeo) and the Communists. How credible is this statement in the light of the near to extinction of Jews in Germany during WWII? Who would benefit most from such a statement? – Right-wing Anti-semitic Revisionists, like the ones running Jew

A high-ranking SS officer, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewsky, stated after WWII:


“I am the only living witness but I must say the truth. Contrary to the opinion of the National Socialists, that the Jews were a highly organized group, the appalling fact was that they had no organization whatsoever. The mass of the Jewish people were taken complete by surprise. They did not know at all what to do; they had no directives or slogans as to how they should act. This is the greatest lie of anti-Semitism because it gives the lie to that old slogan that the Jews are conspiring to dominate the world and that they are so highly organized. In reality, they had no organization of their own at all, not even an information service. If they had had some sort of organization, these people could have been saved by the millions, but instead, they were taken completely by surprise. Never before has a people gone as unsuspectingly to its disaster. Nothing was prepared. Absolutely nothing (20).”

It is highly unlikely that any Jewish interests were in anyway responsible for the routing of the Third Reich in 1945 – in fact, considering the near to extinction that European Jewry experienced, the statement is pathetically absurd.

The US not only resisted Jewish immigration – it actively discriminated against Jews during the entire 20th century:


“In the first half of the twentieth century, in the USA, Jews were discriminated against in employment, access to residential and resort areas, membership in clubs and organizations, and in tightened quotas on Jewish enrollment and teaching positions in colleges and universities. The Leo FrankMarietta, Georgia in 1915 turned the spotlight on antisemitism in the United States and led to the founding of the Anti-Defamation League. The case was also used to build support for the renewal of the Ku Klux Klan which had been inactive since 1870. lynching by a mob of prominent citizens in

Antisemitism in America reached its peak during the interwar period. The pioneer automobile manufacturer Henry Ford propagated antisemitic ideas in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent. The radio speeches of Father Coughlin in the late 1930s attacked Franklin D. Roosevelt‘s New Deal and the notion of a Jewish financial conspiracy.

In the 1940s the aviator Charles Lindbergh and many prominent Americans led The America First Committee in opposing any involvement in the war against Fascism. During his July 1936 visit he wrote letters saying that there was “more intelligent leadership in Germany than is generally recognized.”

“While I still have my reservations, I have come away with great admiration for the German people. .. Hitler must have far more vision and character than I thought….With all the things we criticize he is undoubtedly a great man…. He is a fanatic in many ways and anyone can see there is fanaticism in Germany today…. On the other hand, Hitler has accomplished results (good and bad), which could hardly have been accomplished without some fanaticism.”

America First avoided any appearance of antisemitism and voted to drop Henry Ford as a member for as much. Ford continued his good friendship with the prominent America First member Lindbergh. Lindbergh visited Ford in the summer of 1941. “One month later; Lindbergh gave a speech in Des Moines, Iowa in which he expressed the decidedly Ford-like view that, ‘The three most important groups which have been pressing this country towards war are the British, the Jews, and the Roosevelt Administration.’” In an expurgated portion of his published diaries Lindbergh wrote: “We must limit to a reasonable amount the Jewish influence….Whenever the Jewish percentage of the total population becomes too high, a reaction seems to invariably occur. It is too bad because a few Jews of the right type are, I believe, an asset to any country.”

Considering the resistance to ANY Jewish immigration to the US during the 1930’s and 1940’s it is highly unlikely that JEWISH interests were in any way controlling the war machine. This especially since the actual financial movers, of who a majority were antisemites, were actively co-operating with Germany.

Why would the US Jewry actively work towards the complete extermination of the European Jewry? There is no logic to such notions, unless one believes in elaborate conspiracy theories. But on the other hand, that is exactly what sites like Sweetliberty, Compuserb, Jew Watch, Bible believers,,, and National Alliance do – they all believe that the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is a non-fictional document, and they all carry Benjamin Freedman’s Speech as the “speech of one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century”…

Now, that should give any sensible and logically thinking human an idea of the source, accuracy, motivation and content of this speech.


One Response to “A look at B. Freedman’s Speech 1”

  1. said

    Barack Obama is being given ominous advice from leaders on both sides of the Atlantic to brace himself for an early assault from terrorists. General Michael Hayden, director of the CIA, this week acknowledged that there were dangers during


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: